<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Points of Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christeck.de/wp/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp</link>
	<description>IT, software, gadgets, openstreetmap, synthesizers, and anything else that matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:16:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Paths and Tracks vs. Bridleways, Cycleways and Footways by ce</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2010/01/17/paths-and-tracks-vs-bridleways-cycleways-and-footways/comment-page-1/#comment-2244</link>
		<dc:creator>ce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=1899#comment-2244</guid>
		<description>On the one hand, the cycleway value is used for many different purposes (e.g. any minor way that can be used by bike). On the other hand, we have some jurisdictional dependencies, so german mappers want to cearly express the difference between the following signs:
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_237.svg
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_239.svg
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_240.svg
http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_241.svg

Thus I think it is not the optimal solution to assume that highway=cycleway implies foot=yes. But that&#039;s just my personal two cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand, the cycleway value is used for many different purposes (e.g. any minor way that can be used by bike). On the other hand, we have some jurisdictional dependencies, so german mappers want to cearly express the difference between the following signs:<br />
<a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_237.svg" rel="nofollow">http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_237.svg</a><br />
<a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_239.svg" rel="nofollow">http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_239.svg</a><br />
<a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_240.svg" rel="nofollow">http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_240.svg</a><br />
<a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_241.svg" rel="nofollow">http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Zeichen_241.svg</a></p>
<p>Thus I think it is not the optimal solution to assume that highway=cycleway implies foot=yes. But that&#8217;s just my personal two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Woz predicts the end of the iPod by Apple iTablet</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2008/10/09/woz-predicts-the-end-of-the-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple iTablet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 04:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=45#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>Jobs announce iPad today.. Anyone buying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jobs announce iPad today.. Anyone buying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JOSM Presets updated by ce</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2010/01/17/josm-presets-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>ce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=1884#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>I only maintain the presets, not the code. The feature you mention sounds desirable, so what about filing it in JOSM&#039;s trac (http://josm.openstreetmap.de/)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only maintain the presets, not the code. The feature you mention sounds desirable, so what about filing it in JOSM&#8217;s trac (<a href="http://josm.openstreetmap.de/)?" rel="nofollow">http://josm.openstreetmap.de/)?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sound Collection Tools for the Korg Z1 Synthesizer by Ian Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2009/11/25/sound-collection-tools-for-the-korg-z1-synthesizer/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=1549#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>Good to see a helpful page giving advice to Korg Z1 users.

I agree with your comment about searching through a large number of Korg Z1 sounds, and recommend that you have a look at the latest version of Korg Z1 Editor 2004 as you suggest. There is a Sound Show tool there which can send selected sound patches to the Korg Z1 in succession without needing to press any buttons on the Korg Z1. Worth a mention.


Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see a helpful page giving advice to Korg Z1 users.</p>
<p>I agree with your comment about searching through a large number of Korg Z1 sounds, and recommend that you have a look at the latest version of Korg Z1 Editor 2004 as you suggest. There is a Sound Show tool there which can send selected sound patches to the Korg Z1 in succession without needing to press any buttons on the Korg Z1. Worth a mention.</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JOSM Presets updated by Shaun McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2010/01/17/josm-presets-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=1884#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>Would you be able to add the ability to search all the presets, including synonyms? This alone would make me more interested in using the presets, as I know what I want to add, I just don&#039;t know which sub menus to go through to get it, and it&#039;s faster to just enter the tags manually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you be able to add the ability to search all the presets, including synonyms? This alone would make me more interested in using the presets, as I know what I want to add, I just don&#8217;t know which sub menus to go through to get it, and it&#8217;s faster to just enter the tags manually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Loosing the track of a hiking trip by When it not is your (mapping) day &#171; Points of Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2009/04/26/loosing-the-track-of-a-hiking-trip/comment-page-1/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>When it not is your (mapping) day &#171; Points of Interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=378#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>[...] the end of the trip, the N810 reported that the battery was drained. To avoid data loss, I shut down Maemo Mapper, osm2go and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the end of the trip, the N810 reported that the battery was drained. To avoid data loss, I shut down Maemo Mapper, osm2go and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Traveling to Myrtos, Crete by Ron Vos</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2009/05/31/traveling-to-myrtos-crete/comment-page-1/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=421#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>Kalimera

I would also like to use your beautiful Panorama on my website, offcourse with you (c) notice in it.

Best regards

Ron Vos
webmaster www.mirtos.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kalimera</p>
<p>I would also like to use your beautiful Panorama on my website, offcourse with you (c) notice in it.</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
<p>Ron Vos<br />
webmaster <a href="http://www.mirtos.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.mirtos.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paths and Tracks vs. Bridleways, Cycleways and Footways by Richard Fairhurst</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2010/01/17/paths-and-tracks-vs-bridleways-cycleways-and-footways/comment-page-1/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fairhurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=1899#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>As someone who believes the &quot;path&quot; tag, and &quot;=designated&quot;, to be a nasty, unnecessary piece of tag bloat in most circumstances, I&#039;m sorry to see this. We already have a tag for &quot;dedicated, combined foot- and cycleway&quot; - that&#039;s highway=cycleway; a cycle-only route should be &quot;highway=cycleway, foot=no&quot;.  But then I don&#039;t use JOSM so I don&#039;t really have any right to complain!

&quot;If our editors were better and capable of hiding all the tagging stuff completely&quot;

Potlatch 2 is. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who believes the &#8220;path&#8221; tag, and &#8220;=designated&#8221;, to be a nasty, unnecessary piece of tag bloat in most circumstances, I&#8217;m sorry to see this. We already have a tag for &#8220;dedicated, combined foot- and cycleway&#8221; &#8211; that&#8217;s highway=cycleway; a cycle-only route should be &#8220;highway=cycleway, foot=no&#8221;.  But then I don&#8217;t use JOSM so I don&#8217;t really have any right to complain!</p>
<p>&#8220;If our editors were better and capable of hiding all the tagging stuff completely&#8221;</p>
<p>Potlatch 2 is. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JOSM Presets updated by Jean-Marc Liotier</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2010/01/17/josm-presets-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Marc Liotier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=1884#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>Bashing ? Those changes look much better to me than the previous layout. I share the feelings you explain in the next post - I&#039;m pleased to see that not only am I not the only one have them, but on top of that my favourite editor changes to accommodate them. Thank you !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bashing ? Those changes look much better to me than the previous layout. I share the feelings you explain in the next post &#8211; I&#8217;m pleased to see that not only am I not the only one have them, but on top of that my favourite editor changes to accommodate them. Thank you !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JOSM Presets updated by Paths and Tracks vs. Bridleways, Cycleways and Footways &#171; Points of Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.christeck.de/wp/2010/01/17/josm-presets-updated/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Paths and Tracks vs. Bridleways, Cycleways and Footways &#171; Points of Interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christeck.de/wp/?p=1884#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>[...] Points of Interest IT, software, gadgets, openstreetmap, synthesizers, and anything else that matters      &#171; JOSM Presets updated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Points of Interest IT, software, gadgets, openstreetmap, synthesizers, and anything else that matters      &laquo; JOSM Presets updated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
